Photo by Tim Nwachukwu/Getty Images The Eagles’ QB spoke after their loss to the Falcons and talked about some of the play-calling late in the game, and a bit about his trust in guys like Saquon Barkley and Britain Covey. The Eagles’ loss to the Falcons had some highs and lows for quarterback Jalen Hurts. He spoke to reporters after the game and talked about his message to Saquon Barkley, the effect of missing A.J. Brown on offense, and why he trusts Britain Covey. Here’s what the QB had to say: On his message to Saquon Barkley “Obviously it’s a tough loss. We learn from it. I trust him every day of the week to make a play just like everybody else, and so we’ll be better from it.” Hurts was later asked what the alternative was on that 3rd-and-3 play call if Barkley wasn’t open, but the QB opted not to add any wood to the fire. He reiterated that they just didn’t make the play in the moment, but he still has a ton of trust in Barkley. When asked if that third-down play was one they repped a lot at practice, Hurts simply said, “Yes.” On his late-game interception Hurts explained that he was just trying to make a play down the field, and Jessie Bates made a good play to pick it off. The QB said he’ll just have to continue to prepare for those situations late in games, and put the offense in better positions to take advantage. “I think in the end, I felt very prepared going into those moments. In that moment, it just wasn’t our time.” The quarterback was asked if that was the play call he was expecting at that moment, and he noted that it’s not a matter of expectations, it’s just a matter of executing what’s called. He came up short in that moment. On being without A.J. Brown “Obviously, he’s one of the best receivers in the league. Of course he’s definitely missed, but it doesn’t change the trust that I have in everybody else to step up. I think we had, you know, guys step up in a big way. [Britain] Covey made some great plays out there. [DeVonta Smith] made plays. We just didn’t meet the moment in terms of it wasn’t for us tonight.” As for how the workload was distributed in Brown’s absence, Hurts pointed to OC Kellen Moore, but said that he trusts the offensive coordinator as they continue to build the offense and their rapport together. Still, the QB emphasized that other guys stepped up, and while they all need to do better, ultimately he felt like they played hard and just didn’t take advantage of some of their opportunities. On his trust with Britain Covey “It’s just a lot of time on task working with [Britain Covey], and, you know, conversations and reps, his approach, his intentionality in what he does. And you know, he showed up for us, and we’ll need him to continue to do that. And I think the most important thing is everybody is focused and doing their jobs to help the team win. And, as I said before, to do that, you just have to learn from everything. You have to learn from your mistakes. And we will, we’ll be better from it.” On his message to the team Hurts told the team to keep pressing forward and to keep their heads up. He explained that they need to intensely control the “controllables,” noting there were a lot things that they could clean up from a fundamental and details standpoint in that game. The QB said that they’ve come together as a unit, and now just need to continue on their journey and learn from it all. He later talked about how there isn’t a secret ingredient to pushing through adversity, it’s just a matter of learning from things and getting better as a result. “I said this before and I’ll say it again, there’s no difference between, you know, the joys and the pains, the wins and the losses. It’s a matter of if you can learn from it. I think that’s the perspective that I have on this, whether it is good, bad or indifferent, we’re going to learn from our goal out there to go out there and play dominant football and win football games and do enough to win the game. Ultimately to better ourselves. Better ourselves in growth and learning from these moments. And so in the end, winning is the only thing that matters. And to win, you have to continue to learn. You have to continue to grow. And I think this team will continue to do that.”
Jalen Hurts discusses the Eagles’ loss to the Falcons
The Linc – “The biggest common denominator is Nick Sirianni”
Photo by Wagner Meier/Getty Images Let’s get to the Philadelphia Eagles links … Point the blame for latest Eagles meltdown directly at Nick Sirianni – NBCSP The unthinkable has become the norm. Nightmare endings have become inevitable. It keeps happening and there doesn’t seem to be anything Nick Sirianni can do to stop it. The players have changed. A bunch of ‘em. Twenty-two guys who started a game last year are gone. The coaches have changed. Both coordinators and half a dozen position coaches are new this year. The one thing that hasn’t changed, the biggest common denominator, is Sirianni, and when we start to assign blame for yet another preposterous nightmare Eagles loss, that’s where we have to start. Because his job right now is setting the culture, preparing the football team, making the big decisions that set the tone for what we see on the field. And what we’ve seen on the field way too often lately is disastrous. NFL Week 2 Under Review: The Surprising Saints and Nick Sirianni’s Big Blunder – The Ringer Sirianni has been stripped of almost all of his responsibilities. He doesn’t do the game-planning or play-calling on offense. He doesn’t hire the coordinators. And he doesn’t have autonomy on roster decisions. What he does handle is game management—and he needs to nail it, especially considering that he works for Jeffrey Lurie, who has long been forward-thinking when it comes to analytics. Sirianni turtled in a key spot on Monday night, and it cost his team. A closer look at Nick Sirianni’s faulty decision-making that cost the Eagles – BGN This brings us to the final poor game management decision: kicking a FG to turn a 1 score game into a 1 score game. It is 4th and 3 at the ATL 10-yard line with 1:39 on the clock. The Eagles make the decision to kick a FG, which not only eliminates the possibility of winning the game on 1 play, it also gives up 20 yards of field position (via the ensuing kickoff/touchback) with no time runoff in a situation where time is paramount, and the Falcons have no timeouts. Per ESPN analytics, the probability of winning the game if you go for it on 4th down is 95% while the probability of winning if you kick a FG drops to 90%. But that is baking in the fact that you could convert on 4th down. What if we remove that from the equation entirely? What if we input the scenario of giving the Falcons the ball at the 10-yard line down 3 or the 30-yard line down 6? The result is a 7% win probability in the former and a 10% win probability in the latter. Simply put, the decision to kick a FG, even if you make it, hurts your win probability more than failing a 4th down attempt. Late-game decision making in the Eagles’ loss to the Falcons turned up the heat on Nick Sirianni – Inquirer Penalties fall on the coach, too, because too many can be an indictment of how practices are run. How are the Eagles still getting called for illegal offensive linemen downfield on run-pass options? Wasn’t that a first season issue? But here we are three years into Sirianni’s tenure and the Eagles were flagged three times for the infraction. “Some of them are on us as coaches; some of them are on a player going too fast,” Sirianni said. “We coach that, not to go too fast. But some of them are on us in certain scenarios when we call them.”Sirianni was more aggressive on fourth downs earlier in the game. He went for it on the Eagles’ second series on fourth-and-4 at the Falcons’ 9. But he had Hurts drop on both third and fourth down. Why not run it on third knowing he would gamble on fourth? Handing out 10 awards from the Eagles-Falcons game – PhillyVoice 6) The ‘No Resistance’ Award: The Eagles’ run defense. Of course, it’s hard to rush the passer when you’re getting gashed by the run. Bijan Robinson and Tyler Allgeier combined for 23 carries for 150 yards (6.5 yards per carry). The Packers ran for 7.8 yards per carry against the Eagles’ defense Week 1. That’s an ugly developing trend. The entire Eagles defensive front is playing the run poorly, particularly Huff, but more alarmingly, where are Jordan Davis and Jalen Carter? A Bad Loss – Iggles Blitz The DL was invisible. Atlanta has an underrated OL, but they shouldn’t manhandle the Eagles the way they did. That is incredibly troubling. Kirk Cousins had all day to throw on the final drive. The Eagles knew they would be passing and still couldn’t get close. The holes in the zone coverage are massive. The defense feels like a group of individuals rather than a cohesive unit right now. That has to change. The tackling was bad. Again. Nick Sirianni and his coaching staff have a lot of issues to fix on a short week. And they have the hottest team in the league on the schedule for the next game. That’s not ideal at all. NFL Week 2: Biggest questions, takeaways for every game – ESPN Eye-popping stat: Cousins was pressured on just 2-of-14 dropbacks (14%) in the first half, the lowest rate he’s faced in any half since Week 1 of 2023. 2024 NFL Season, Week 2: What We Learned from Falcons’ win over Eagles on Monday night – NFL.com Philly needs to clean it up. The Eagles will look back at this one with significant regret for more than just how the game ended. Philadelphia had a number of positive gains wiped out by penalties — including three illegal man downfield flags — and even the positive plays that stood occasionally came with a catch (e.g., Hurts’ scramble and spike, which drew a delay of game penalty). It’s early, and these kinds of minor errors tend to happen. But nine penalties (accepted for
Giants at Cleveland Browns 2024, Week 2: Everything you need to know
Giants at Cleveland Browns 2024, Week 2: Everything you need to know See all of our coverage as the Giants try to avoid an 0-3 start Contributors: The 0-2 New York Giants have not started the season the way they wanted to. A lopsided Week 1 loss to the Minnesota Vikings at home was followed by a narrow Week 2 loss to the Washington Commanders that the Giants easily could have won. Now, the Giants begin a six-game stretch against teams that are all likely playoff participants at the end of this season. This week, the Giants travel to Huntington Bank Field in Cleveland, Ohio to face the 1-1 Cleveland Browns. Per FanDuel Sportsbook, the Giants are 6.5-point underdogs. Kickoff Sunday is at 1 p.m. ET, with the game being broadcast on FOX. The Browns lost to the Dallas Cowboys in Week 1, 33-17. In Week 2, Cleveland narrowly defeated the Jacksonville Jaguars, 18-13. Follow our StoryStream below for all of our pre-game, in-game, and post-game coverage as the Giants try to avoid an 0-3 start.
A closer look at Nick Sirianni’s faulty decision-making that cost the Eagles
Photo by Tim Nwachukwu/Getty Images I have seen a lot of misunderstanding out there about the faulty decision making by the Eagles at the end of their collapse to the Falcons. When I was in elementary school, I loved going to the High School football games and would always take my trusty notebook with me to keep track of run/pass splits and man/zone defense alignments. As soon as football season was over, it was on to basketball where I kept shot charts for every player on the team. I knew from an early age that I was a very (very) big nerd and sometimes I forget that everyone else isn’t. So what follows is me attempting to explain optimal decision making for football games, and since it is fresh I’ll use the Eagles game as an example, although this logic applies to any game. Declining a Penalty on 3rd and 1 The first decision point that I’ve seen confusion about is the Eagles declining an encroachment penalty on 3rd and 1 at the ATL 18 with 2:00 left. This was the correct call. If the Eagles accept the penalty, it is now 1st down and the Falcons, assuming they get a stop, can use 3 timeouts on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd down to minimize clock runoff and get the ball back with about 1:45 on the clock. By declining the penalty, the Eagles force the Falcons to call a timeout after 3rd down which means that they will now be out of timeouts following 2nd down on the next set of downs and there will be an entire play clock the Eagles can run out following the next 3rd down. The probability of being stopped on 3rd and 1 is very small, especially with the Tush Push at their disposal, and if they are stopped they can still go for it on 4th down. The Falcons knew that, that’s why they intentionally committed a penalty. The Eagles knew that too, that’s why they declined the penalty. Passing the Ball on 3rd & 3 Now we get to the exact situation that we are trying to set up when we declined the previous penalty. It is 3rd and 3 at the ATL 10. There is 1:46 left on the clock and the Falcons are out of time outs. If you pick up a 1st down the game is over. If you don’t, you have a decision to make on 4th down (which is a fairly easy one, but we will get to that momentarily). In the world where you don’t get the 1st down, it is vital that the clock continue to run. With the time to run the play and the ensuing 40 second play clock, you can take the clock below 60 seconds before a potential 4th down snap. The one thing you can’t do, is let the clock stop. The Eagles dialed up a pass play and it resulted in a drop. The play call is a bad decision. Should it have worked? Yes. Saquon Barkley should have secured the catch and the game should be over. But he didn’t, and now it isn’t, and now the clock stops. If you call a run play in that situation, the clock will continue to roll, even if you don’t pick up the 1st down. Sure, the Falcons are expecting a run, but they have been expecting a run the entire drive and your last 3 handoffs have gone for 9, 4, and 3 yards. But the yardage isn’t even the most important thing, the time is. Per ESPN analytics, the Eagles would have had a 96% chance to win the game if they had run the ball on 3rd down and had no gain. The decision to decline a penalty on 3rd and 1 so you could get to this exact situation to run the clock, and then not run the clock is inconsistent and the wrong decision. Kicking a FG to Go Up 6 This brings us to the final poor game management decision: kicking a FG to turn a 1 score game into a 1 score game. It is 4th and 3 at the ATL 10-yard line with 1:39 on the clock. The Eagles make the decision to kick a FG, which not only eliminates the possibility of winning the game on 1 play, it also gives up 20 yards of field position (via the ensuing kickoff/touchback) with no time runoff in a situation where time is paramount, and the Falcons have no timeouts. Per ESPN analytics, the probability of winning the game if you go for it on 4th down is 95% while the probability of winning if you kick a FG drops to 90%. But that is baking in the fact that you could convert on 4th down. What if we remove that from the equation entirely? What if we input the scenario of giving the Falcons the ball at the 10-yard line down 3 or the 30-yard line down 6? The result is a 7% win probability in the former and a 10% win probability in the latter. Simply put, the decision to kick a FG, even if you make it, hurts your win probability more than failing a 4th down attempt. Why is that? It is for the simple reason that teams down 3 tend to score 3 points, while teams that are down 6 tend to score 7 points. Down 3, teams get conservative once they are in FG range, content to take the game to overtime. When they are down 6, they are forced to be aggressive and go for the win. Kicking a FG in this situation costs you a chance to win the game with a conversion, 20 yards of field position, and the opponent’s natural tendency towards conservativism while really only gaining you the ability to not go to OT if they kick a FG. It is the quintessential “playing not to lose” strategy. When Bad Decisions
Nick Sirianni attempts to explain questionable decision-making in Eagles loss to the Falcons
Photo by Cooper Neill/Getty Images Following the Eagles ugly one-point loss to the Falcons, head coach Nick Sirianni spoke to reporters and tried to explain some of their play-calling decisions, what their plan was without A.J. Brown, and why he thought Jalen Hurts played an outstanding game. He admitted that they didn’t do a good enough job in the last two minutes of the game, saying they are all responsible for the loss — coaches and players — and it’s never just one play that results in a one-point loss. Here’s what else the head coach had to say: On specific play call decisions Calling a timeout on the second to last drive Sirianni said that they were going to delay and then call a timeout, so it wasn’t anything to do with Fred Johnson. On passing on 3rd-and-3 The head coach acknowledged that there is a mechanism on the play for QB Jalen Hurts to sit down and take a sack, but they saw an opportunity that didn’t work out. “You know, they were running a certain defense and junking it up in the middle, so we were trying to go around the outside and it didn’t work.” Sirianni also explained the decision to kick a field goal on the subsequent 4th-and-3 play, saying that he thought they might not have any timeouts left, though they did get one with the incomplete pass, but with a minute left they wanted to go up six points. He acknowledged that it didn’t work. “So, the decision to pass it there, again, like I said, they were junking it up inside, with it being fourth and three to go for it, I thought with them not having any timeouts I wanted them to be down a touchdown and see if they could drive the field and they did. Hats off to them.” On the play-calling role Sirianni was curt with his reply when asked to clarify if the play calls were coming from him or OC Kellen Moore. “Kellen is the offensive coordinator that makes the calls, yeah. If you’re trying to stir that up. I’m the head coach.” On A.J. Brown’s absence Sirianni wouldn’t confirm A.J. Brown’s comments on the broadcast divulging that he expects to miss a couple of weeks, with the head coach saying he’s not going to give a timetable because they don’t know what will happen. While it was tough to lose Brown late in the week, when the game plan was already established, they’ve all been in the league long enough to know that those things can happen and to adjust. “You change the game plan around. You still want to attack them a certain way, but now you’re going to use different players in how you attack them. So obviously A.J. being down, he’s one of the best players in the NFL, so you’re going to miss him. Yeah, us having the time to go over and switch everything, we had plenty of time to do that. You know, like I said, I think that the offense, where we struggled on offense was more so in the red zone. We moved the ball well. So, it was those struggles in the red zone we’ve got to get corrected, because you’ve got to score points down there. Sometimes it was like you guys have said, I went for it in those scenarios; sometimes we stopped ourselves.” On the defense’s lack of QB pressures Sirianni said they’ll have to look at the film to see what went wrong, but explained that sometimes you have to earn the right to rush the QB by securing the passing game. The Falcons weren’t in a bunch of passing situations because they were getting 4-6 yards per carry in early downs. “This is football. It doesn’t matter what level you’re at. It’s how you tackle, it’s how you defeat blocks, it’s how you pierce the line of scrimmage. And then we’ve got to be able to make sure we put them in positions to succeed. There are plenty of ways to do it. Sometimes with five down front, sometimes it’s with the six down front, sometimes it’s with the pressure, sometimes it’s with secondary pressure, sometimes it’s with blitz zero, sometimes it’s moving the front. I mean, yeah, we’ve got to do what we need to do to help put them in positions. It’s not just ever, ‘Hey, do this to stop this.’ That’s just not how football works. There are many different answers, and we’ve got to find the right answers and help put the guys in position and the guys got make plays.” On the missed tackles “A couple missed tackles in some situations. A couple good tackles. I thought the guys, early, had great effort to the football. We knew we needed to do that with Bijan [Robinson] the way he can make somebody miss. It felt like when he would make somebody miss, there would be somebody right there on his hip. We knew he would get some that would make some guys miss, but our emphasis was trying to make sure we were there with the rest of the guys to pick up the pieces.” On Jalen Hurts’ performance “You know, some of his big runs came on scrambles. There were a couple that were uncalled runs. I thought obviously any time an interception happens you’re going to want that back, but I thought — I looked up at the scoreboard at one point, he was 20 of 25, making a lot of plays for our team in the run game and pass game. I thought he really played an outstanding game. Again, we’ll all have things that we want back. I think the biggest issue on offense was we weren’t good enough in the red zone. Jalen did a lot of things to help us to be in that football game and have a chance to win that football game. He played a really
10 takeaways from Rams 41-10 loss to Cardinals: Where do you go from here?
Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images Where do the Rams go after a 41-10 loss to the Cardinals The Los Angeles Rams fell to the Arizona Cardinals 41-10 on Sunday to drop to 0-2. It’s the first time in the Sean McVay era that the Rams have dropped to 0-2. The big question now with all of the injuries is where the Rams go from here. They have a game against the San Francisco 49ers in Week 3 with the potential for this season to really get away from them. Here are my 10 takeaways from Sunday. 1. Missed opportunity to take momentum early The Rams started the game about as good as any team would like. Rookie Blake Corum returned the opening kickoff to midfield and the Kyren Williams followed that up with a nine yard run. Unfortunately, that was about as good as it got. Back-to-back runs from Williams went nowhere. McVay then made the correct decision to go for it on fourth down and called a bubble screen to Kupp. The blocking downfield wasn’t as good as it needed to be and it was a turnover on downs. There was an opportunity to set the tone early and instead the Rams gave the Cardinals momentum. The Rams set the tone in the wrong way. 2. Marvin Harrison Jr. for the next decade will be fun Of course Marvin Harrison Jr.’s breakout game comes against the Rams. On the Cardinals’ opening possession, Murray found Harrison in the back of the end zone. While it was close, it was a play that would have stood either way that it was called. At the end of the day, Tre White got beat. On the first play of the next possession, Harrison got behind Kam Curl to score his second touchdown on as many plays. The insult to injury was Harrison Jr. getting behind the defense on a 3rd-and-5 at the Cardinals 17 for a first down. It was a reminder that the Cardinals got a generational prospect in the first round at wide receiver and the next decade or so will be a lot of what happened on Sunday. Harrison Jr. is very good and is going to be tough to defend against. The Rams need a better plan and better execution. 3. The secondary was supposed to be better It wasn’t supposed to be like this. The Rams signed Tre White and Darious Williams to avoid the big plays in the passing game. Kam Curl was brought in to give the secondary a physical presence while the Rams have been excited for Quentin Lake. Yes, Williams is injured, but it’s hard to say that was the difference. At the end of the day, the Rams secondary allowed Kyler Murray to have a perfect passer rating. Trey McBride added six receptions for 67 yards while Harrison popped off for 130. It can get better and it needs to be better. With that said, this could also be the result of trying to put a bandaid on what was a much larger problem. 4. Run defense and tackling must improve Through two weeks, the Rams defense is allowing a rushing success rate of 55.1 percent. Last year’s Rams defense allowed a rushing success rate of 39.1 percent in Weeks 10-2. This is the worst the Rams run defense has been since 2020 when they allowed a rushing success rate of 53.1 percent. We’re past the days of stopping the run being the most important part of playing defense. Still, there are two many easy plays to be had and because of that the defense isn’t getting stops. Additionally, the tackling needs to be better. Several times the defense seemed to have Murray in their grasp and instead it turned into a big play the other way. Running back James Conner forced six missed tackles. The Rams front seven simply was not wrapping up. It’s the little things right now for the defense that’s puzzling and it has to get better moving forward. 5. Rams didn’t match Cardinals energy from the start The odd thing about the loss was the lack of energy. From the first drive, the Cardinals just looked to be out-working the Rams. That’s not something that you usually see from a Sean McVay coached team. All offseason, there was talk about the energy that the defensive side of the ball brought on a daily basis. Again, that side of the ball looked like they were playing at half speed in moments. Sometimes it just isn’t your day and that was certainly the case for the Rams. At the same time, the lack of energy is concerning. If you can’t get up for a divisional game on the road while staring at 0-2, when are you going to bring it? Hopefully they show up next week against the San Francisco 49ers. 6. Not good enough in short yardage situations The Rams and second or third and one six times. They turned that into a first down on one occasion throughout the entire game and that happened on the final drive. That doesn’t include a third and one that ended in a punt. They had second and three twice, one of which game in and “and-goal” situation and the Rams punted and had a turnover on downs. Those are favorable situations and to be as poor as the Rams were is a big reason for the loss. Some of that has to do with the offensive line and not being able to run block. Those are obvious running situations and the Rams got beat up front on every occasion. At the same time, those are downs that you just have to find a way to win. Instead of extending drives or getting points, many of them ended in a change of possession the other way. 7. Rams missed Puka Nacua’s impact as a blocker As much as the Rams missed the presence of Puka Nacua in the passing game, it
Jermaine Burton earns highest grade on Bengals offense from PFF
Photo by Jason Mowry/Getty Images And he wasn’t the only rookie in the top five. The Jermaine Burton truthers will like this one. The rookie receiver earned the highest overall grade (76.3) on the entire Cincinnati Bengals offense from Pro Football Focus. This despite only getting 10 snaps. That was almost thirty points more than Trenton Irwin (47.4) who had 35 snaps, and also well ahead of Ja’Marr Chase (59 snaps, 57.5 PFF grade) and Andrei Iosivas (49 snaps, 55.3 PFF grade), despite his two touchdowns. Yes, it’s a super small sample size, but it does seem that Burton deserves more chances. And he’s not the only rookie who impressed. Tight end Erick All Jr. had the fifth highest overall offensive grade on the Bengals (66.9) thanks to his contributions both as a receiver and a blocker. Another newcomer, tight end Mike Gesicki, finished third in overall offensive grades (72.3), largely thanks to acting as a reliable target for quarterback Joe Burrow. On defense, no one should be surprised by the high grades of: Akeem Davis-Gaither (90.4), who had an early interception of Patrick Mahomes Trey Hendrickson (89.8), who simply could not be contained Cam Taylor-Britt (89.6), who had a beautiful one-handed interception or Germaine Pratt (83.9), who had a perfectly timed forced fumble But the best player on defense, according to PFF, was actually DJ Turner II (90.9). The second year corner with speed to spare had a nearly flawless game, which is a great sign for this team. Check out all the top grades here: Week 2 Bengals PFF Grades pic.twitter.com/vLJC5nQU5q — Parker Blake (@ParkerBlake60) September 16, 2024
Texans/Vikings Opening Odds: Minnesota a Home Underdog Again
Blue Steel! (Purple Steel?) | Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images Though it isn’t as many points as last week Going into their home opener against the San Francisco 49ers, the Minnesota Vikings found themselves as a home underdog against the defending NFC champions. This week, for their home game against one of the early Super Bowl favorites in the AFC, the purple finds itself in a similar position. According to our friends at FanDuel, the Vikings have opened their Week 3 matchup against the Houston Texans as a 2.5-point underdog on their home turf. The over/under for this one has opened at 46.5 points. This looks to be a very good matchup against two teams that have both started the season with 2-0 marks. They’re also the top two teams in the league after two weeks in terms of quarterback sacks, as the Vikings have tallied 11 quarterback takedowns thus far while the Texans have recorded nine. The Vikings will be keeping their eyes on the injury statuses of some key players in this one. Justin Jefferson suffered a quad contusion in the fourth quarter but says he’ll be good to go by Sunday, while Jordan Addison will be attempting to come back from the ankle issue that caused him to miss the victory over San Francisco. Rookie linebacker Dallas Turner is also dealing with a knee issue but Kevin O’Connell was optimistic about his chances to play in his Monday press conference. This game will also see a host of former Vikings making their return to U.S. Bank Stadium, as there are four former Vikings now calling Houston home: wide receiver Stefon Diggs, linebacker Danielle Hunter, running back Cam Akers, and cornerback Kris Boyd. This will be Diggs’ second shot at the Vikings since leaving Minnesota ahead of the 2020 season, as he was on the Buffalo Bills’ team that lost in crazy fashion to the Vikings in Buffalo in 2022. There are also a couple of former Texans getting a chance to face their former team in purple, as linebackers Jonathan Greenard and Blake Cashman starred for Houston last year but both made their way to Minnesota this past offseason. Hopefully this matchup will live up to the hype it will likely get over the course of this week. Unless things drastically shift over the next few days, however, it looks like the Vikings will be playing the role of underdog for the second straight week.
Five Things I Think I Think About the Miami Dolphins – Week 2
Photo by Megan Briggs/Getty Images alluvion (noun) – a great flow of water or of something that overwhelms I’m gonna come at this from a different angle. Jaylen Wright looks good. Chop Robinson looks promising. This game, as ugly as it felt, was entirely down to turnovers. Without them, the stats were nearly identical and the score was close. Even with the turnovers, Miami was a few yards from being down 14 points with a full quarter left to play. That’s pretty much all of the positivity I can muster. Let’s look at some other points that will in no way immediately collapse into problems. De’Von Achane looks like the real deal Second year running back De’Von Achane racked up 96 yards on 22 carries, while adding 7 receptions for 69 yards and a TD. He had 29 touches after being questionable coming into the game. You can decide for yourself if that’s appropriate management of his injury risk, but he finished the game in tact and pretty dominant. So. That’s nice. Miami had a decent game plan on defense Despite Mr. January rolling into town in the September heat, Anthony Weaver had a plan that minimized his impact. Josh Allen was kept in check, finishing 13/19 (68%) for 139 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT. Miami forced Buffalo to rely on their non-Josh Allen players. Too bad those players did an excellent job. Buffalo had the exact same game plan to deal with the Fins. They took away Tyreek Hill and Jaylen Waddle, forcing MIA to rely on their non-Tyreek and Jaylen players. Too bad those players did a terrible job. Offensive play calling was better at the beginning Mike McDaniel took fair criticism in Week 1 for some less-than-ideal play calling. In Week 2, the early offense showed a good balance of run v. pass, more general variety, utilized some different players, and relied on fewer horizontal throws. Then, it quickly got stupid. Before long, the plays were targeting our weakest areas, such as wide receivers who were unprepared to produce (twice resulting in interceptions), going to the FB dive too predictably on short yardage downs, and eventually even leaning into our absolute worst positions, i.e. running behind a backup LT and LG in critical situations. It puts the mind in a very angry bottle. Also, the drive to end the first half was insanity. I don’t know what MM’s deal is with timeouts, but they must have really hurt him in a past life. Next 3rd and 2, throw a slant. They used to be really good at those and have a little bit of speed to work with. Just don’t target WR6. Speaking of: The team is extremely top heavy We all talked about the need for a reliable third wide receiver last week and that’s only gotten painfully more obvious. Lack of depth across the board is a significant issue. After Hill and Waddle, there’s nothing. After Terron Armstead, there’s nothing. After Raheem Mostert— well, that’s cool. Tightest of ends Julian Hill dropped two TD passes. No, they weren’t perfect, but he makes enough money to go ahead and catch them anyway. You can pay me a fraction of his salary and I’ll not score just the same. Grant DuBose mostly caused the first interception and Robbie Chosen contributed to the second. Neither should be getting real reps. Is Hunter Renfrow still out there? What he lacks in hair he makes up for in hands. I’ve written less on these first four points than I (an unregulated, overly verbose mutant) normally do because there’s really only one thing I think right now: Buffalo looked like an average team and MIA needed to take advantage of that Instead, they laid a monumental egg. Like an ostrich egg coming out of a mouse. Blame it on Allen’s mythical gloved hand or whatever, but Buffalo is a very beatable team. They’re worse than they’ve been for the last few years and it doesn’t feel like a secret. This was a golden opportunity for Miami and they took that CD out in clear daylight and they scratched it. Does Miami feed its own narratives and self perpetuate all the problems that have plagued them forever? Like, I don’t know, giving up long 3rd downs on defense, being less physical every week, failing to convert short yardage situations, committing costly penalties, and withering in prime time? It’s almost incomprehensible that these SAME PROBLEMS show up year after year, now for decades. The front office changes, the coaches change, the players change, the system changes, and yet, the problems persist. If it wasn’t so sad, I’d have to laugh. A 3rd and 12 gets converted for 33 yards? How many times does that have to happen before it’s fixed? I’m not even asking rhetorically, there has to be a hard number here, but it appears to be above countability. Jordan Poyer did his level best to up the physicality, hitting as hard as possible to the point of penalties way down field after surrendering a bunch of yards instead of just playing well. Miami needs to be a more punishing team, but has to embody that in the trenches, not as headhunters. The line looks overmatched all the time. Their best case is standing the pass rusher up with zero push back. I think that sets a tone that carries throughout the rest of the roster. Speed is great, but sometimes it has to be backed up with a little muscle. It’s probably a symptom of having both subpar players and injuries on the O-line, but that’s not new. It’s the oldest story in the Dolphins’ book. And I’m getting extremely tired of reading it. How about short yardage situations? 3rd and 2? 4th and 1? These should be stressful for the defense. Instead, Fins fans wince while we watch the same failed attempts til our eyes fall out. If the line isn’t up to par stuffing it straight up the
Lions-Bucs key stats: Death to screen passes, long live the run game
Sign up for Season 2 of PODD Big things are in store for our newsletter, Pride of Detroit Direct. I’m excited to announce we’ve added Ty Schalter this season. Listen to exclusive podcasts sent directly to your inbox and read more voices from our team at Pride of Detroit by clicking below to sign up for a 7-day free trial today!

